Creating Photographic Art Has Never Been Easier.

A Point Of View

Terry Gipson

After reflecting on the events at a recent conference I attended, I became aware again of the growing ability to process images quickly. 

Adding artificial intelligence-derived elements to one’s images is easily done with selecting and dragging. Copying presets to multiple images is as easy as a click of a button.

Using presets from others can result in wonderful outcomes without having to know how it happened or how to create that process on your own.

After reflecting on the events at a recent conference I attended, I became aware again of the growing ability to process images quickly. Adding artificial intelligence-derived elements to one's images is easily done with selecting and dragging. Copying presets to multiple images is as easy as a click of a button. Using presets from others can result in wonderful outcomes without having to know how it happened or how to create that process on your own. This advance in digital photographic processing allows one to flood the market with more of one's work. Mass processing is easily achieved. And I see many migrating to readily adopt the latest in software development. This technological pace becomes tiresome to me after a while. The only bit of creativity seems to be trying out a new device or piece of software without any concern for one's art. The art produced becomes stale, stagnant, and mundane. It shows the progression of technology and not the artist’s vision. Technological progress in the photography and software worlds is exciting to see, and the draw to participate is compelling. However, is there something lost in this ability to create massive quantities of the same work? Two questions come to mind: Is your work defined by what you can do with the latest software and camera-ware? OR Do you look at the latest software and camera-ware to see if it furthers your own path in your art and then decide if it is worth adopting? The answer to these questions defines our work. Is your work defined by technology or art? In art there are no right answers. There is only honesty about one’s work. There will always be someone more up to date on the latest software or camera-ware than me. I will never be unique in that area. I can only be unique in art by being myself and sharing my own experience. That is a much slower and less exciting process than staying up to date with the current pace of software and camera-ware development. My inner pace is so much slower than the rest of the world. Nature is perhaps the only thing that moves slower than my personal experience. That's why I venture into nature to discover and express my art. In nature I can slow my own pace to hear into the stillness of my own experience. In that stillness I find inspiration for my art. Becoming a master of the latest technology is far from becoming a master in one's art. Accomplishment in art is slower and takes much more effort and time than adopting the latest software or camera-ware. It is a life-long and complicated effort. Few want to expend the energy necessary to achieve that level of mastery. Flooding the internet with one's work is also far from becoming a master at producing fine art prints on your own. It is harder now to find true hand-made art than ever before. In photography it is even harder.
Zabriskie Point Death Valley

This advance in digital photographic processing allows one to flood the market with more of one’s work. Mass processing is easily achieved. And I see many migrating to readily adopt the latest in software development.

This technological pace becomes tiresome to me after a while. The only bit of creativity seems to be trying out a new device or piece of software without any concern for one’s art. The art produced becomes stale, stagnant, and mundane. It shows the progression of technology and not the artist’s vision.

After reflecting on the events at a recent conference I attended, I became aware again of the growing ability to process images quickly. Adding artificial intelligence-derived elements to one's images is easily done with selecting and dragging. Copying presets to multiple images is as easy as a click of a button. Using presets from others can result in wonderful outcomes without having to know how it happened or how to create that process on your own. This advance in digital photographic processing allows one to flood the market with more of one's work. Mass processing is easily achieved. And I see many migrating to readily adopt the latest in software development. This technological pace becomes tiresome to me after a while. The only bit of creativity seems to be trying out a new device or piece of software without any concern for one's art. The art produced becomes stale, stagnant, and mundane. It shows the progression of technology and not the artist’s vision. Technological progress in the photography and software worlds is exciting to see, and the draw to participate is compelling. However, is there something lost in this ability to create massive quantities of the same work? Two questions come to mind: Is your work defined by what you can do with the latest software and camera-ware? OR Do you look at the latest software and camera-ware to see if it furthers your own path in your art and then decide if it is worth adopting? The answer to these questions defines our work. Is your work defined by technology or art? In art there are no right answers. There is only honesty about one’s work. There will always be someone more up to date on the latest software or camera-ware than me. I will never be unique in that area. I can only be unique in art by being myself and sharing my own experience. That is a much slower and less exciting process than staying up to date with the current pace of software and camera-ware development. My inner pace is so much slower than the rest of the world. Nature is perhaps the only thing that moves slower than my personal experience. That's why I venture into nature to discover and express my art. In nature I can slow my own pace to hear into the stillness of my own experience. In that stillness I find inspiration for my art. Becoming a master of the latest technology is far from becoming a master in one's art. Accomplishment in art is slower and takes much more effort and time than adopting the latest software or camera-ware. It is a life-long and complicated effort. Few want to expend the energy necessary to achieve that level of mastery. Flooding the internet with one's work is also far from becoming a master at producing fine art prints on your own. It is harder now to find true hand-made art than ever before. In photography it is even harder.

Technological progress in the photography and software worlds is exciting to see, and the draw to participate is compelling. However, is there something lost in this ability to create massive quantities of the same work?

Two questions come to mind: 

  • Is your work defined by what you can do with the latest software and camera-ware? OR
  • Do you look at the latest software and camera-ware to see if it furthers your own path in your art and then decide if it is worth adopting?

The answer to these questions defines our work. Is your work defined by technology or art?

Terry Gipson

In art there are no right answers. There is only honesty about one’s work.

There will always be someone more up to date on the latest software or camera-ware than me. I will never be unique in that area. I can only be unique in art by being myself and sharing my own experience. That is a much slower and less exciting process than staying up to date with the current pace of software and camera-ware development.

My inner pace is so much slower than the rest of the world. Nature is perhaps the only thing that moves slower than my personal experience. That’s why I venture into nature to discover and express my art. In nature I can slow my own pace to hear into the stillness of my own experience. In that stillness, I find inspiration for my art.

Terry Gipson

Becoming a master of the latest technology is far from becoming a master in one’s art. Accomplishment in art is slower and takes much more effort and time than adopting the latest software or camera-ware. It is a life-long and complicated effort. Few want to expend the energy necessary to achieve that level of mastery.

Flooding the internet with one’s work is also far from becoming a master at producing fine art prints on your own. It is harder now to find true hand-made art than ever before.

In photography, it is even harder.


Terry Gipson
January 2020
Terry Gipson
Littleton, CO

I am a physician still actively practicing medicine in the US. In my spare time, I seek the opportunity to express my creative side through the advancement of newer artistic processes from my photography. You are welcome to see and purchase my work and follow the journey at terrygipsonphotography.com. Terry Colorado USA [email protected] www.terrygipsonphotography.com

Article Type: News, Columns, MISC

Become A Supporter Of PhotoPXL

Become a member and gain access to our new features including high-resolution images, privacy options, higher photo upload limits, multi-photo uploads, night mode, and more!

PhotoPXL is an idea to create a place of community where those with a passion for photography can come to learn and share. We hope you enjoy your experience on our site and find a home here.

Your support is critical to the success and future of photoPXL. To bring you great content we depend on your support. Please consider helping us grow and broaden all aspects of what we do here.

Support PhotoPXL for as little as a $1. It takes only a minute. Thank You.

Be the first to know

Sign up for newsletter
  • Please check your spam and forum folders if you do not see our verification email.

Recent Posts

Categories