Concepts from my book of the same name… The Optimum Digital Exposure – “Introducing the OneZoneTM Digital Exposure Method” For too long we have been accepting the “digital look” of our photographs. The compression of tones, especially in the dark areas, seems...Read more
Author, teacher and inventor, Bob currently conducts workshops, lectures and private instruction in the area of digital photography. [Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Certified / Xrite Coloratti ]
50 years of photographic involvement that includes:
About Bob DiNatale
Author, teacher and inventor, Bob currently conducts workshops, lectures and private instruction in the area of digital photography. [Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Certified / Xrite Coloratti ] 50 years of photographic involvement that includes: > FILM: worked at Polaroid R&D in silver emulsions and optical sensitizing dyes; a US patent in color printing; > DIGITAL: first presented digital media productions in 1984; founded the Olympus School of Digital Photography in 1998. > INSTRUCTION: Nikon School of Photography; Time-Life School of Photography; Boston University; University of Massachusetts. > AUTHOR: "The Optimum Digital Exposure"; "Processing the Digital Image"
Forum Replies Created
AuthorTopic: The Optimum Digital Exposure Read 0 Times
The Optimum Digital Expsoureon: November 21, 2020 at 6:03 pm
First, thank you for your time and thoughts. We have met before and discussed some of these concepts. You may remember me, I’m the short fellow with the wavey hair.
I understand PV 2012 is all about process benefits and was a big change (…but I must admit I didn’t know it was “Local Laplacian Filters”). However, this processing all comes after capturing an optimum exposure which would benefit greatly from the advancement in PV 2012.
I reference a discussion with Eric (Madman) Chan in an Adobe forum in 2012:
BobDiN Community Beginner , Mar 13, 2012
> I have been using “Auto” as the 1st step then continue adjustments by image as needed
– Do you agree with this approach?
– Does “Auto-tone” loose PV2012’s powerful adaptive “Highlights” and “Shadows” capabilities?
> I guess the simple question is “Does “Auto-tone” take advantage of the adaptive “Highlights” of PV2012 while still finding a White & Black point?”
MadManChan2000 Adobe Employee , Mar 19, 2012
> Yes, Auto Tone essentially works top-down.
> No, Auto Tone does not lose PV 2012’s adaptive highlights & shadows capabilities. Instead, it leverages them.
> Yes, it takes advantage of the adaptive highlights/shadows of PV2012 while still finding a white & black point.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
As for your post, I don’t know how to answer this paragraphically so I will try to express my thing by segment.
1. “I watched George’s video as usually, he does a fine job of explaining things simply, but…”
…I understand there has been a lot of advancements in processing software algorithms but the all happens after digital capture.
2. “In a nut shell, what PV 2012 did was to modify the tone mapping of raw images and alter the nature of the way Highlights and Shadows worked to bring out what otherwise might be difficult image data. Highlights is a modern form of high light recovery that compresses image data but allows you to tease the data apart. Shadows is an updated algorithm that replaced Fill Light and helps boost shadow detail.”
The updated “Fill Light” algorithm seems it would be especially beneficial with ETTR’s placement of shadow data above noise.
3. “The net result is that tone mapping is a bit more complicated post PV 2012 because the actual “numbers” may mean different things to different images. That’s the image sensitive adaptive nature of PV 2012.”
As I understand it, PV2012 create data from data which makes processing of each digital capture image-dependent! Which is why my first ACR step is to “AutoTone”… to set out Adobe’s it’s Laplacian/Lilliputians fairies to tie down the Gulliver-ian data from an optimum exposure and optimally process the data of that given capture.
4. “Of course, ETTR presupposes that the scene you are shooting has luminance values that fall within the dynamic range of your sensor–and don’t forget, you lose a stop of dynamic range for every stop you push ISO over the native optimal ISO of your sensor.”
Hmm, I respect your knowledge but empirically in all my optimum-exposure shooting over the last 7 years, I have not noticed this in my photographic results. Maybe I’ve benefited from the Lilliputians in PV2012 😊.
I need to run my “Empirical Proof” test from my book at 2 extreme ISOs to validate.
5. “After Michael wrote that original article–which was what Michael learned from Thomas Knoll after taking a trip shooting together–he got a lot of grief largely because he made the mistake of mixing his metaphors when talking about bit depth and signal to noise ratios. A lot of people misunderstood what Michel (paraphrasing Thomas) was trying to get across–don’t shoot digital like you used to shoot chrome film, under expose to keep from blowing out the highlights.”
I agree with the misunderstanding of the chrome-film analogy… I’ve run into Zone System people who exposure their digital captures by shooting minimum exposure for maximum black!
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Jeff, Your Thoughts on This Question
When the shadows in a scene are captured at EV2 (thus placing the shadow at Luminance 40+), would you still call luminance at that value as being “shadows”?
Thanks again for your time and thoughts
Re: The Optimum Digital ExpsoureReply #1 on: November 19, 2020 at 11:34 pm
- This reply was modified 4 days, 5 hours ago by Christopher Sanderson. Reason: Removed html formatting tags
Thanks for the link. I found it interesting… but, I never said nothing about histograms or zones.
I’m an empirical kind of guy. We all can keep reading, or, we can do our own testing, or, we can stop the chase and watch this video by George Jardine “A Few Thoughts On Exposure & Tone Mapping“. In my mind, his video is the definitive work and best explanation I’ve seen on this subject.
You mentioned, “This idea is still doing the rounds” … maybe after watching George’s video, the idea should stop going round and we should get on with our photography!
Fun sharing thoughts,
Thank Again, Bob
Re: The Optimum Digital ExpsoureReply #2 on: November 19, 2020 at 11:34 am
- This reply was modified 5 days, 13 hours ago by Christopher Sanderson. Reason: Removed html formatting tags
Thanks, your support is welcomed and appreciated.
As an icon and teacher in our industry, this means a lot to me… and I’m sure others .