cupped

Tagged: ,

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Topic: cupped Read 218 Times
  • Jeremy Roussak
    Jeremy Roussak
    Keymaster
    Posts: 230
    Landscape & Nature Photography
    on: October 5, 2019 at 7:08 am

    Comments?

    pxl-1

    Jeremy

    Attachments:
    Kevin Raber
    Kevin Raber
    Keymaster
    Posts: 554
    Re: cupped
    Reply #1 on: October 5, 2019 at 7:52 am

    God, there we so many icebergs.  Nice capture.  I would consider not showing so much top and also crop in a bit from the left. The diagonals in the rock face take my eye away fro ht subject.

    Kevin Raber
    CEO & Publisher of PhotoPXL.com and Rockhopperworkshops.com

    Rajan Parrikar
    Rajan Parrikar
    Participant
    Posts: 3
    Re: cupped
    Reply #2 on: October 6, 2019 at 1:11 pm

    It is an excellent composition.

    Mike Nelson Pedde
    Mike Nelson Pedde
    Participant
    Posts: 465
    Re: cupped
    Reply #3 on: October 6, 2019 at 9:21 pm

    I agree with Kevin. I’d chop about 1/4 from the top and the left side. As it is, the piece in front is like a finger pointing to the upper left corner of the frame. The top of the berg in the back is pointing in the same direction, and the runoff channels in the background are also in line. The bottom line is that everything is literally pointing to take my eye out of the frame. If it was mine I’d probably crop the top to the top of the iceberg on the right side, and I’d bring the left in to about the tip of the finger. By cutting off the finger tip at the edge, it become just another shape and my eye wanders back into the frame.

    One man’s opinion. YMMV!!

    Mike.

    _____
    Mike Nelson Pedde
    Victoria, BC
    https://www.wolfnowl.com/

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.