C1 for upscaling image size ??
AuthorTopic: C1 for upscaling image size ?? Read 357 Times
ParticipantPosts: 2Capture Oneon: October 20, 2019 at 7:04 am
Just wondering which would be your preferred method for upscaling a phase one raw image to 40in x 60in for printing at 300ppi?
C1, Photoshop or On-One / genuine fractals?
I capture with an IQ3 100mp back.
My method has been to process to 100% in C1 at 16bit then take it into GF for the upscale.
Does this yield the best results?
ParticipantPosts: 50Re: C1 for upscaling image size ??Reply #1 on: October 20, 2019 at 9:01 am
For that relatively minor upsize (<50% @ 40×53.3), I would just use Photoshop Preserve Details 2.0. I’ve experimented with Genuine Fractals, Topaz Gigapixel AI and Photoshop Preserve Details 2.0. For upsizes like this I don’t think there are significant differences. I print two-image stitch files from the IQ180, IQ3100 and IQ4 150 @ 40×90. Doing test strips first, I feel print-wise there is no discernible difference. I suspect differences crop up at <200%, but I don’t have experience doing that amount of upscaling with Phase One files.
- This reply was modified 11 months, 1 week ago by Dave Chew.
ParticipantPosts: 2Re: C1 for upscaling image size ??Reply #2 on: October 21, 2019 at 5:48 am
Thanks for your response. Just to clarify, you would not upscale in C1?
ParticipantPosts: 50Re: C1 for upscaling image size ??Reply #3 on: November 19, 2019 at 10:51 pm
Sorry Greg, just saw this now. I’ve never done it, so I don’t know anything about its capabilities. I have a funky workflow: I process files in C1 then output a full-size tiff of just select images to a LR master catalog. That has been my primary catalog program for years, so I’ve stuck with it. Therefore, all of my printing is through either LR or ImagePrint.
I been shooting with at least 80 mp files since 2011, so the need to upsize is pretty rare. When I do, it is done post-Capture One.
- This reply was modified 10 months ago by Dave Chew.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.